<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nearly &#8220;Riskless&#8221; Covered Call Strategy</title>
	<link>http://www.callwriter.com/blog/2007/03/05/new-riskless-covered-call-strategy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: think</title>
		<link>http://www.callwriter.com/blog/2007/03/05/new-riskless-covered-call-strategy/#comment-163</link>
		<author>think</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 15:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callwriter.com/blog/2007/03/05/new-riskless-covered-call-strategy/#comment-163</guid>
					<description>You will be bettr off saving commissions and capital by using a simple long call vertical which is synthetically same as your collar strtategy. See http://mediaserver.thinkorswim.com/transcripts/collars.pdf fro explanation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You will be bettr off saving commissions and capital by using a simple long call vertical which is synthetically same as your collar strtategy. See <a href="http://mediaserver.thinkorswim.com/transcripts/collars.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://mediaserver.thinkorswim.com/transcripts/collars.pdf</a> fro explanation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Brasher</title>
		<link>http://www.callwriter.com/blog/2007/03/05/new-riskless-covered-call-strategy/#comment-165</link>
		<author>John Brasher</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.callwriter.com/blog/2007/03/05/new-riskless-covered-call-strategy/#comment-165</guid>
					<description>I disagree with Preston. The purpose of SuperPut trades is to allow the generation of reliable income streams over time. It is not designed to be an in/out trade, though sometimes it can be closed quickly at a profit. The same and synthetically the same are two different things. For instance, covered calls and naked puts are synthetically the same if comparing their risk-reward graphs but very different strategies, and managed differently. For example, long stock does not expire. The SuperPut allows tremendous flexibility in managing the trade. A lot of options traders believe that anything stock can do, options can do better. That is sometimes right and sometimes wrong.

Also, the Superput (calendar collar) allows the use of a very high level of portfolio margin if desired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with Preston. The purpose of SuperPut trades is to allow the generation of reliable income streams over time. It is not designed to be an in/out trade, though sometimes it can be closed quickly at a profit. The same and synthetically the same are two different things. For instance, covered calls and naked puts are synthetically the same if comparing their risk-reward graphs but very different strategies, and managed differently. For example, long stock does not expire. The SuperPut allows tremendous flexibility in managing the trade. A lot of options traders believe that anything stock can do, options can do better. That is sometimes right and sometimes wrong.</p>
<p>Also, the Superput (calendar collar) allows the use of a very high level of portfolio margin if desired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
