|
July 21, 2004
Analysis of a Bear Call Spread
by John Brasher, CallWriter Publisher
| As you
know, we at CallWriter like credit spreads.
A few newsletters back we promised a credit spread on the
CallWriter website. We picked one on Sierra
Wireless that worked out great. Since we get a lot of questions
on spreads, we are devoting this newsletter issue to an analysis
of the pick: why we picked it, how it worked and why it worked.
|
|
The following bear call spread trades in Sierra
Wireless (SWIR) appeared on our members website in the
Closer Look report on June 25, 2004. We highlighted two possible
trades, one conservative (and less profitable) and one that was
very profitable (but riskier). These trades if run would have expired
profitably on July 16th. Let's analyze them, including why we picked
them and why they worked.
A bear call spread is a credit spread,
meaning that it generates a net credit (money in
your pocket) when the trade is run. The bear call spread is simple,
consisting only of selling a call and buying a higher-strike call.
Because you pay less for the long call than you receive for the
short call, it generates a credit. This spread is essentially another
way to cover a call - instead of buying the stock to cover the calls,
you instead buy a higher-strike call.
If the trade works as planned (meaning that the
stock closes below the short call strike sold), the trader lets
the spread expire, keeping the entire credit. If the stock closes
between the short strike sold and the breakeven point, the trader
still makes a profit, but less. If the stock closes above the breakeven,
the trader takes a loss, and the maximum loss sustainable is the
amount of the net spread (total spread less the credit received).
It is simpler than it sounds, as this table illustrates:
| Bear
Call Spread #1 |
| Sold
Lower-Strike Call Option |
Bought
Higher-Strike Call Option |
| Underlying
stock |
Sierra
Wireless (SWIR) |
Underlying
stock |
Sierra
Wireless (SWIR) |
| Call option |
JUL
35 |
Call option |
JUL
40 |
| Action |
Sell
to Open (+$2.30) |
Action |
Buy
to Open (-$0.85) |
| Net
Credit |
$
1.45 ($2.30
- $0.85) |
| Net
Spread |
$
3.55 ($40 - $35 - $1.45) |
| Stock
Price at Write |
$34.95 |
| Breakeven
price |
$36.45
($35 + $1.45) |
| Stock
Price at Exp. |
$29.97 |
| Final
Profit (Loss) |
$1.45 |
In Bear Call Spread #1, the trader would have sold
the JUL 35 calls and bought the same number of JUL 40 calls. The
JUL 40s were bought for $0.85, but the trader received $2.30 for
selling the JUL 35s. The difference - the $1.45 credit - is kept
by the trader. The trader is risking a maximum possible loss of
$3.55 against a maximum possible profit of $1.45, which is a 2.5:1
risk ratio. The stock went over $37 at several points before expiration,
and the unlucky trader could have gotten early assignment on the
short JUL35. Barring such bad luck, however, this was a winning
trade.
Now lets look at the conservative SWIR trade that
could have been run:
| Bear
Call Spread #2 |
| Sold
Lower-Strike Call Option |
Bought
Higher-Strike Call Option |
| Underlying
stock |
Sierra
Wireless (SWIR) |
Underlying
stock |
Sierra
Wireless (SWIR) |
| Call option |
JUL
40 |
Call option |
JUL
45 |
| Action |
Sell
to Open (+$0.70) |
Action |
Buy
to Open (-$0.25) |
| Net
Credit |
$
0.45 ($0.70
- $0.25) |
| Net
Spread |
$
4.55 ($45 - $40 - $0.45) |
| Stock
Price at Write |
$34.95 |
| Breakeven
price |
$40.45
($40 + $0.45) |
| Stock
Price at Exp. |
$29.97 |
| Final
Profit (Loss) |
$0.45 |
Bear Call Spread #2 was a far more aggressive trade,
though paradoxically safer, the trader would have sold the JUL 40
calls and bought the same number of JUL 45 calls. The JUL 45s were
bought for only $0.25, but the trader received $0.70 for selling
the JUL 40s. The difference - the $0.45 credit - is kept by the
trader. But note that the trader is risking a maximum possible loss
of $4.55 against a maximum possible profit of $0.45, which is a
10:1 risk ratio. The stock never got close to the short JUL 40 strike
through expiration and so was never in danger of early assignment.
Why did we like SWIR for a bear call spread? There
were several reasons. First, it is a relatively small company, without
a lot of market support depth. Second, its average stock trading
volume is below two million shares daily. While this is high for
an ideal bear call spread, it is on the low end for acceptable covered
call stocks. Admittedly, the best credit spread trades tend to have
low stock volume and other indicia of being lousy investments. In
fact, if you would consider writing a covered call on a stock, it
is NOT a bear call spread candidate! To paraphrase the farmer, you
want a lousy stock ain't going nowhere. SWIR also had relatively
low open interest in the different call series, another indicia
of low liquidity and low market interest.
And best of all, it had strong resistance right
at $35, the short strike sold in the JUL 35/JUL 40 spread. It subsequently
tested resistance and went above $37 but couldn't hold it.
Although the 40/45 spread posed the highest ratio
(10:1) of capital risked against potential return, it actually was
safer, on a technical basis, since SWIR was unlikely to rise above
$40 over the short run. The $35 resistance level gave significant
protection against a major stock advance. That is, if the stock
broke resistance and held it, there probably would have been time
enough to buy back the short strike and ride the long strike for
profit. The 35/40, which offered far more profit and a much better
risk/reward ratio than the 40/45, was actually the far riskier trade,
since the stock was already right at the $35 resistance level at
the time the pick was made. Had SWIR sustained the above-$37 prices,
it would have handed the 35/40 trader a loss. But as is so often
the case, this was just the stock penetrating resistance briefly
in a failed breakout.
Write out of the money: Write
bear call spreads that are out of the money, meaning that the short
strike sold is above the stock's price at trade entry. In the above
examples, the 40/45 was well out of the money by over $5 when we
made the pick, but the 35/40 spread was right at the money. This
leaves room for stock movement before
you have to make a decision whether to close the
trade. Never, never, never write a spread that is in the money,
because you are depending on a stock movement that is large enough
to get the stock price below the short strike. Worse, you are depending
on that movement to happen before expiration, and it won't always
happen on time. (Finally, remember that there is such a thing as
early assignment.)
Write above resistance: The smart
bear call spread trader will have a strong resistance level below
the short strike sold. The farther below the resistance level is
and the stronger it is, the better. If you consistently write with
resistance right at the short strike, you'd better be one heck of
a chartist.
NOTE: A bear put credit spread
is the mirror image: you sell a put and buy a lower-strike put that
is farther out of the money. Thus is the stock price is $22, then
the Short 20/Long 17.50 put spread would be out of the money.
|