|
For
those not particularly enamored of covered calls, the
main objection to them is the notion that the call writer
gives up all the price appreciation in the stock after
the call is written. (That notion isn't necessarily
true, by the way, but it is the main objection.)
Like everything else, though, it depends on how one trades.
With modern order entry being as flexible and powerful
as it is, I'd venture to say that most covered call writes
are run as buy-writes, in which the calls
are written when the underlying stock is bought; usually
simultaneously. But there is a different technique used
by savvy call writers that can propel the covered call
to a much higher return:
Buy
the stock on strength;
Sell the covered call on the stock's advance.
Known
as “legging in,” this covered
call technique involves first buying the stock when it
is showing strength by advancing on news, then selling
the call only later - usually days later - as the stock
price continues to rise, in order to get far more call
premium (and a commensurately larger return) than by running
the trade as a buy-write. It is called "legging in"
because the stock and call legs of the trade are done
separately. If the stock moves up significantly before
you sell the call, it is possible to get significantly
more for the call than if you wrote it with the stock
buy - - sometimes double or triple the buy-write return.
Example:
Stocks frequently move up on earnings anticipation,
even though they mostly will give up the advance after
earnings are reported. One earnings-driven technique
is to wait for the stock to run up on earnings anticipation
(which usually occurs after the earnings preannouncement
is made and before the actual report), then sell ITM
calls about 3 days before the announcement date.
The
simple illustration below compares the differences in
running the trade as a buy-write and selling the call
only after the stock has moved. Let's assume that we buy
hypothetical BUM Corporation (BUMM) at $21after it has
started a move up on news and examine how we might do
by legging in a week later when the stock is $23,
as compared to doing a buy-write in which we write the
call at the same time we buy the stock at $21:
| Example
1 |
| Action |
ITM
Buy-Write |
Action |
Legging
In ITM |
| Bought
BUMM shares |
-$
21.00 |
Bought
BUMM shares |
-$
21.00 |
| Sold
20 Calls on entry when stock was $21 |
+$
1.90 |
Sold
20 Calls week later when stock was $23 |
+$
3.65 |
| Net
debit
(breakeven point) |
-$
19.10 |
Net
debit
(breakeven point) |
-$
17.35 |
| Return
if Called (Loss) |
$
0.90 |
Return
if Called (Loss) |
$
2.65 |
Percentage
Return
|
4.29% |
Percentage
Return
|
12.62% |
Notice
that legging in once the stock had moved up gave us nearly
three times the return, and lowered the breakeven
point by almost $2.00, compared to doing a buy-write.
And this is true even though we got only 0.60 of time
value on the leg-in compared to 0.90 of time value with
the buy-write. The reason is that once you sell an at-the-money
(ATM) or in-the-money (ITM) call on a buy-write trade,
your return is fixed, whether called out or not. But by
waiting as the stock moves up and legging in, you get
a far larger premium for selling the same strike.
Why
did I use an ITM call in the example? Because that's how
I like to do it. It depends on your strategy, of course,
and your read of the stock. Another trader expecting a
meteoric rise might write OTM instead of ITM, and one
wouldn't necessarily be wrong in doing so. But the ITM
call still gives you a huge return and great downside
protection. And what goes up can just as easily come down,
especially if a resistance level is in the way. Use common
sense. Let the stock's chart and its trading history tell
you what to do.
If
the stock does pull back once you've written the calls
(won't you be glad you wrote ITM then?), then you use
the usual bag of tricks to manage the trade, as necessary.
The really great thing about legging in and writing ITM
is that it positions you beautifully to close the trade
at a fat profit, because the ITM call will drop dollar-for-dollar
with the underlying stock (an ATM or OTM call will not).
Or roll the calls down if necessary, based on where a
good support level and your breakeven are. In the above
example, legging in lowered the breakeven from 19.10 to
17.35, almost $6.00 below the $23 stock price when the
call was written. That's a lot of protection.
This
is the crux of the legging in technique, isn't it? You
have to believe, and reasonably believe, that the stock
is imminently going to advance. Due to the possibility
that the stock will pull back before you've written
a call (and thus have no downside protection yet), you
need a well-founded belief that the stock is going up.
Here are some of the more popular bases for expecting
an advance:
| 1. |
Stock is moving up on
earnings expectation, as discussed above. |
| 2. |
A ranging stock has hit the bottom
of the range, held support and started back up in
the channel. These are wonderful, but you don't find
them every day. |
| 3. |
A stock in a solid uptrend has pulled
back and found support at the trendline or 50-day
moving average and looks poised to resume the trend
(a favorite). |
| 4. |
The chart pattern indicates
an imminent advance, such as a chart completing
a double bottom, reverse head-and-shoulders, etc.
Note: Tread carefully here
if you are an inexperienced chartist, although you
certainly should "paper trade" a promising
technical candidate even if you don't trade it.
This is a great way to learn, even though paper
trading takes the emotion out of the equation. |
In
regard to timing, my philosophy is to get confirmation
- evidence the move has started. Don't rush to buy the
stock before it has shown some movement. You will do better
with this technique to get confirmation of the stock's
direction rather than trying to get in before the move
has started!
For
CallWriter members, one way to spot such stocks is to
look at the stock's MADI (the Moving Average Directional
Indicator) when scanning our Real Time Lists™ of
the highest-returning covered call trades. The MADI
shows the stock's 14-day and 50-day moving averages expressed
as percentages. When the stock is showing the 50-day MADI
essentially flat (00 or 01) but the 14-day MADI is higher,
it can indicate that the stock has fallen back to the
50-day moving average and is advancing again.
What
if the stock doesn't go up as planned? If you use this
technique, it will happen sooner or later. Not every stock
you try it on will in fact go up. Legging in means that
you get no income and no downside protection when making
the stock buy. That is the trade-off for positioning yourself
to make a much bigger hit on the stock move. If the stock
doesn't start the expected move within a few days or stalls
or pulls back, this is a bad sign. How long you should
give it to move really depends on the reason for it and
how long you expect it to take. If the move should happen
immediately, that is your baseline. If the move might
not happen for a couple of weeks, why did you buy the
stock already?
If
the stock does not make its move or stalls, either sell
the stock to close, or simply write the calls and pick
up some income for your trouble - and downside protection.
Before the calls are written, be sure to set a reasonable
stop on the stock that is GTC (good 'til canceled), so
that you don't get caught on an adverse movement. And
use a trailing stop, meaning that you move the stop up
as the stock moves up. Where to set the stop will depend
on how the stock trades. Day traders will typically set
the stop below the prior day's close or in similar fashion,
but that is too tight for the legging-in technique. Set
the stop either right below the 50-day moving average
(the stock should be above the 50-day MA), or set it at
some percentage below the buy price, based on how much
the stock typically oscillates. If the stock oscillates
10% in a week, a stop set 5% below the buy is almost guaranteed
to get you stopped out for a loss.
Caution:
legging in is not an excuse to write calls on a stock
that you would avoid absent expectation of an immediate
price rise! All the rules of sensible covered call writing
still apply when legging in.
Traders
worry about writing naked calls (selling calls where you
don't own the underlying stock), but this is not a concern
when using the legging-in tactic. You are never naked
when legging in. When you finally write the calls, you
already own the stock. In fact, it is the stock that is
"naked" until you write the call.
For
those feel reasonable confident in their ability to at
least occasionally spot stocks advancing, but who are
not comfortable legging in, there is an alternative trade:
simply write out-of-the-money (OTM) calls along with the
stock buy. Suppose the stock is $20 and you expect an
immediate advance: simply write the 22.50 or 25 Call.
If you are called out at the higher strike, you will realize
a huge return, just like the trader who bought the stock
at $20 and legged in.
I
normally am a fan of writing the current month's call,
or at a maximum writing with expiration no more than 30
days out. However, depending on when you expect the movement,
that may not be practical. You might have to write the
next month's calls, or go over the 30-day mark. You have
to give the trade time to work. Let's compare an OTM buy-write
on the BUMM trade above to legging in to it:
| Example
2 |
| Action |
OTM
Buy-Write |
Action |
Legging
In ITM |
| Bought
BUMM shares |
-$
21.00 |
Bought
BUMM shares |
-$
21.00 |
| Sold
22.50 Calls on position entry when stock was $21 |
+$
0.75 |
Sold
20 Calls week later when stock is $23 |
+$
3.65 |
| Net
debit
(breakeven point) |
-$
20.25 |
Net
debit
(breakeven point) |
-$
17.35 |
| Profit
if Called(Loss) |
$
2.25 |
Profit
if Called (Loss) |
$
2.65 |
Percentage
Return
|
10.71% |
Percentage
Return
|
12.62% |
Legging
in will usually produce a bigger return than an OTM buy-write
using the same stock buy price, but it all depends on
when the trade is entered, the volatility skew of the
calls, where the stock is in relation to available call
strikes, and other factors. In this illustration the OTM
call did less well than the leg-in trade, but that will
not invariably be the case. Both the OTM write and the
legging-in technique depend on stock movement for maximum
profitability.
The
OTM premium may be small, at least compared to premium
for an available call that is at or near the money, and
it certainly will not provide as much downside protection,
but it does provide some return and some downside protection.
If instead of legging in, you chose to write the OTM call,
you can always buy the calls back and close the trade
if the stock retreats. Keep in mind, though, that OTM
calls don't lose value dollar-for-dollar like ITM calls
when the stock drops. This means that the OTM call written
on the stock can hold a frustrating amount of time value
if the stock pulls back, so the downside protection provided
by the OTM call will be mostly illusory in some cases
- not all.
Legging
in is not a magical strategy - there aren't any. But for
traders able to assess stock movements, and it gets easier
the longer you trade, it can really knock covered call
returns out of the park.

Ways
to Try CallWriter
 |
Try
CallWriter for 10 days without risk
- absolutely free! You'll have full
access to our membership site! A
$27.00 value Details |
|
 |
Buy
one month of CallWriter membership
and get the second month free! $79.95 Save $79.95 Details |
|
 |
Buy
John's Ultimate Covered Call Book
now and get two full months of CallWriter
membership. $139.95 Save $119.90 Details |
Contribute
an Article
To
contribute an article to the Money NewsLetter,
send your contribution, along with your promotional
byline, to: newsletter@callwriter.com.
We don't pay contributors, but we will include
your byline and a link to your website.
Reproduction
Don't
hesitate to print out this newsletter for
your own use or forward a copy of it to your
friends and associates (we want you to), but
please ask permission before reproducing the
content in any form -- we would like to know
who you are and how you are using it.
Disclaimer
We
are not brokers, investment advisers or securities
analysts and do not recommend the purchase,
sale or holding of any security. Your use
of any information or strategy appearing in
this newsletter or on CallWriter.com is solely
at your own risk. We urge our newsletter subscribers
and CallWriter.com website members to do all
requisite and analysis and properly plan each
trade prior to making the trade and to manage
each trade effectively. Covered call and other
potential trades discussed in this newsletter
or on CallWriter.com do not constitute trading
recommendations by CallWriter or any other
person and are presented by solely for informational
and educational purposes. |
|