|
July 7, 2004
Legging in to Covered Call Trades:
Buying Strength - a Technique to Propel Your Returns
by John Brasher, CallWriter Publisher
| I've spoken and written
a great deal about various trade management techniques designed
to pull a larger return from open trades. There is, however,
a technique to increase the covered call return that actually
is deployed at trade entry, not after the
trade is put on. Referred to as "legging in," this
technique can significantly boost returns.
|
|
For those
not particularly enamored of covered calls, the main objection to
them is the notion that the call writer gives up all the price appreciation
in the stock after the call is written. (That notion isn't necessarily
true, by the way, but it is the main objection.) Like
everything else, though, it depends on how one trades. With modern
order entry being as flexible and powerful as it is, I'd venture
to say that most covered call writes are run as buy-writes,
in which the calls are written when the underlying stock is bought;
usually simultaneously. But there is a different technique used
by savvy call writers that can propel the covered call to a much
higher return:
Buy
the stock on strength;
Sell the covered call on the stock's advance.
Known as “legging
in,” this covered call technique involves first buying
the stock when it is showing strength by advancing on news, then
selling the call only later - usually days later - as the stock
price continues to rise, in order to get far more call premium (and
a commensurately larger return) than by running the trade as a buy-write.
It is called "legging in" because the stock and call legs
of the trade are done separately. If the stock moves up significantly
before you sell the call, it is possible to get significantly more
for the call than if you wrote it with the stock buy - - sometimes
double or triple the buy-write return.
Example:
Stocks frequently move up on earnings anticipation, even though
they mostly will give up the advance after earnings are reported.
One earnings-driven technique is to wait for the stock to run
up on earnings anticipation (which usually occurs after the earnings
preannouncement is made and before the actual report), then sell
ITM calls about 3 days before the announcement date.
The simple
illustration below compares the differences in running the trade
as a buy-write and selling the call only after the stock has moved.
Let's assume that we buy hypothetical BUM Corporation (BUMM) at
$21after it has started a move up on news and examine how we might
do by legging in a week later when the stock is $23, as compared
to doing a buy-write in which we write the call at the same time
we buy the stock at $21:
| Example
1 |
| Action |
ITM
Buy-Write |
Action |
Legging
In ITM |
| Bought
BUMM shares |
-$
21.00 |
Bought
BUMM shares |
-$
21.00 |
| Sold
20 Calls on entry when stock was $21 |
+$
1.90 |
Sold
20 Calls week later when stock was $23 |
+$
3.65 |
| Net
debit (breakeven
point) |
-$
19.10 |
Net
debit (breakeven
point) |
-$
17.35 |
| Return
if Called (Loss) |
$
0.90 |
Return
if Called (Loss) |
$
2.65 |
Percentage
Return
|
4.29% |
Percentage
Return
|
12.62% |
Notice that
legging in once the stock had moved up gave us nearly three times
the return, and lowered the breakeven point by almost $2.00, compared
to doing a buy-write. And this is true even though we got only 0.60
of time value on the leg-in compared to 0.90 of time value with
the buy-write. The reason is that once you sell an at-the-money
(ATM) or in-the-money (ITM) call on a buy-write trade, your return
is fixed, whether called out or not. But by waiting as the stock
moves up and legging in, you get a far larger premium for selling
the same strike.
Why did I
use an ITM call in the example? Because that's how I like to do
it. It depends on your strategy, of course, and your read of the
stock. Another trader expecting a meteoric rise might write OTM
instead of ITM, and one wouldn't necessarily be wrong in doing so.
But the ITM call still gives you a huge return and great downside
protection. And what goes up can just as easily come down, especially
if a resistance level is in the way. Use common sense. Let the stock's
chart and its trading history tell you what to do.
If the stock
does pull back once you've written the calls (won't you be glad
you wrote ITM then?), then you use the usual bag of tricks to manage
the trade, as necessary. The really great thing about legging in
and writing ITM is that it positions you beautifully to close the
trade at a fat profit, because the ITM call will drop dollar-for-dollar
with the underlying stock (an ATM or OTM call will not). Or roll
the calls down if necessary, based on where a good support level
and your breakeven are. In the above example, legging in lowered
the breakeven from 19.10 to 17.35, almost $6.00 below the $23 stock
price when the call was written. That's a lot of protection.
This is the
crux of the legging in technique, isn't it? You have to believe,
and reasonably believe, that the stock is imminently going to advance.
Due to the possibility that the stock will pull back before
you've written a call (and thus have no downside protection yet),
you need a well-founded belief that the stock is going up. Here
are some of the more popular bases for expecting an advance:
| 1. |
Stock
is moving up on earnings expectation, as discussed above. |
| 2. |
A ranging
stock has hit the bottom of the range, held support and started
back up in the channel. These are wonderful, but you don't find
them every day. |
| 3. |
A stock
in a solid uptrend has pulled back and found support at the
trendline or 50-day moving average and looks poised to resume
the trend (a favorite). |
| 4. |
The chart pattern indicates an imminent advance, such as a
chart completing a double bottom, reverse head-and-shoulders,
etc.
Note:
Tread carefully here if you are an inexperienced chartist,
although you certainly should "paper trade" a promising
technical candidate even if you don't trade it. This is a
great way to learn, even though paper trading takes the emotion
out of the equation. |
In regard
to timing, my philosophy is to get confirmation - evidence the move
has started. Don't rush to buy the stock before it has shown some
movement. You will do better with this technique to get confirmation
of the stock's direction rather than trying to get in before the
move has started!
For CallWriter
members, one way to spot such stocks is to look at the stock's MADI
(the Moving Average Directional Indicator) when scanning our Real
Time Lists™ of the highest-returning covered call trades.
The MADI shows the stock's 14-day and 50-day moving averages expressed
as percentages. When the stock is showing the 50-day MADI essentially
flat (00 or 01) but the 14-day MADI is higher, it can indicate that
the stock has fallen back to the 50-day moving average and is advancing
again.
What if the
stock doesn't go up as planned? If you use this technique, it will
happen sooner or later. Not every stock you try it on will in fact
go up. Legging in means that you get no income and no downside protection
when making the stock buy. That is the trade-off for positioning
yourself to make a much bigger hit on the stock move. If the stock
doesn't start the expected move within a few days or stalls or pulls
back, this is a bad sign. How long you should give it to move really
depends on the reason for it and how long you expect it to take.
If the move should happen immediately, that is your baseline. If
the move might not happen for a couple of weeks, why did you buy
the stock already?
If the stock
does not make its move or stalls, either sell the stock to close,
or simply write the calls and pick up some income for your trouble
- and downside protection. Before the calls are written, be sure
to set a reasonable stop on the stock that is GTC (good 'til canceled),
so that you don't get caught on an adverse movement. And use a trailing
stop, meaning that you move the stop up as the stock moves up. Where
to set the stop will depend on how the stock trades. Day traders
will typically set the stop below the prior day's close or in similar
fashion, but that is too tight for the legging-in technique. Set
the stop either right below the 50-day moving average (the stock
should be above the 50-day MA), or set it at some percentage below
the buy price, based on how much the stock typically oscillates.
If the stock oscillates 10% in a week, a stop set 5% below the buy
is almost guaranteed to get you stopped out for a loss.
Caution:
legging in is not an excuse to write calls on a stock that you
would avoid absent expectation of an immediate price rise! All
the rules of sensible covered call writing still apply when legging
in.
Traders worry
about writing naked calls (selling calls where you don't own the
underlying stock), but this is not a concern when using the legging-in
tactic. You are never naked when legging in. When you finally write
the calls, you already own the stock. In fact, it is the stock that
is "naked" until you write the call.
For those
feel reasonable confident in their ability to at least occasionally
spot stocks advancing, but who are not comfortable legging in, there
is an alternative trade: simply write out-of-the-money (OTM) calls
along with the stock buy. Suppose the stock is $20 and you expect
an immediate advance: simply write the 22.50 or 25 Call. If you
are called out at the higher strike, you will realize a huge return,
just like the trader who bought the stock at $20 and legged in.
I normally
am a fan of writing the current month's call, or at a maximum writing
with expiration no more than 30 days out. However, depending on
when you expect the movement, that may not be practical. You might
have to write the next month's calls, or go over the 30-day mark.
You have to give the trade time to work. Let's compare an OTM buy-write
on the BUMM trade above to legging in to it:
| Example
2 |
| Action |
OTM
Buy-Write |
Action |
Legging
In ITM |
| Bought
BUMM shares |
-$
21.00 |
Bought
BUMM shares |
-$
21.00 |
| Sold
22.50 Calls on position entry when stock was $21 |
+$
0.75 |
Sold
20 Calls week later when stock is $23 |
+$
3.65 |
| Net
debit (breakeven
point) |
-$
20.25 |
Net
debit (breakeven
point) |
-$
17.35 |
| Profit
if Called(Loss) |
$
2.25 |
Profit
if Called (Loss) |
$
2.65 |
Percentage
Return
|
10.71% |
Percentage
Return
|
12.62% |
Legging in
will usually produce a bigger return than an OTM buy-write using
the same stock buy price, but it all depends on when the trade is
entered, the volatility skew of the calls, where the stock is in
relation to available call strikes, and other factors. In this illustration
the OTM call did less well than the leg-in trade, but that will
not invariably be the case. Both the OTM write and the legging-in
technique depend on stock movement for maximum profitability.
The OTM premium
may be small, at least compared to premium for an available call
that is at or near the money, and it certainly will not provide
as much downside protection, but it does provide some return and
some downside protection. If instead of legging in, you chose to
write the OTM call, you can always buy the calls back and close
the trade if the stock retreats. Keep in mind, though, that OTM
calls don't lose value dollar-for-dollar like ITM calls when the
stock drops. This means that the OTM call written on the stock can
hold a frustrating amount of time value if the stock pulls back,
so the downside protection provided by the OTM call will be mostly
illusory in some cases - not all.
Legging in
is not a magical strategy - there aren't any. But for traders able
to assess stock movements, and it gets easier the longer you trade,
it can really knock covered call returns out of the park.
|