|
Dividends
and What They Portend
Virtually
all mature, profitable public companies pay a cash dividend
to shareholders, which actually is a distribution to the
owners (stockholders) of a part of the company's earnings.
Dividends must by state corporate law be paid out of current
or retained earnings. Dividends are widely considered by
investors to provide a valuable gauge to the company's health.
A company's willingness, and ability, to pay dividends through
the years indicates its stability. Dividends provide needed
income for many investors and provide a strong measure of
certainty concerning the company's prospects. An increase
in the dividend is considered a strong sign that bodes well
for the firm's future (and vice versa, as noted below).
A company generally is viewed quite favorably when it initiates
a dividend; it in effect is joining the big-boy club.
Growth
companies frequently do not pay dividends, preferring instead
to use their cash to spur growth, on the assumption that
the growth in the stock price is more valuable to their
stockholders than a dividend would be. That assumption works
so long as the company's growth continues at a high rate,
but as the company matures and growth slows, it will tend
to pay dividends to keep shareholders in their seats, because
the continued reinvestment of dividend cash in the business
gets spread across less and less growth. Investors want
growth in value or dividends. Microsoft, which for many
years paid no dividend, is a classic example. By paying
dividends, a company essentially is conceding that the growth
obtainable from reinvesting profits may not provide as great
a return to investors as the dividend payments. Initiating
dividends is a consequence of protracted success and a validation
of the company.
Are
Dividends Important?
For
several reasons, yes. For one thing, dividends cannot be
faked (unlike accounting measures such as earnings) - the
check cashes or it doesn't. For another, stocks that pay
dividends are much less likely to reach ridiculous values
in a bear market. This is why so many companies with strong
dividends outperform the overall market in a market decline.
The other side of the coin is that the dividend-paying stocks
usually never fly as high as the growth stocks in a bull
market. Dividends thus are a much more important factor
for investors in flat and declining markets, but much less
important in bull markets, when investors are looking for
a quick buck due to market forces. A fast-growing company
should not divert precious cash to shareholders, but any
company should be delivering either high growth or reasonable
dividend. Why else would you own it?
There
are those who oppose dividends, though, as cash giveaways.
They argue that shareholder interests are better served
by using the cash to drive growth (through revenue generation,
acquisitions, etc.) or repurchasing shares. And if the company
is delivering high growth (and quality growth), the argument
makes sense. But if the company is mature and growth is
incremental, investors are not as willing to hold the stock
without the dividend income stream. Again, the company has
to deliver either growth (and the stock had better appreciate,
too) or income. In answer to the argument that dividends
are not that helpful to shareholders anyway, due to high
taxation, the income tax rate has been lowered for qualifying
dividend income. Another argument is that dividends are
unnecessary because shareholders have other ways to generate
income, such as writing covered calls. But that argument
misses the point. Give me growth or give me dividend!
On
the contrary, not paying a reasonable dividend can actually
result in harm to shareholders. Hoarding cash can lead to
excessive executive compensation, poor management, and employing
assets in unproductive ways. One study found that the more
cash a company keeps, the more likely it will overpay for
acquisitions. Dividend-paying companies tend to be more
efficient in their use of capital than similar companies
that do not pay dividends and are less likely to engage
in funny accounting. After all, for mature companies the
proof of the pudding is in the dividend check. It is the
growth companies that cook the books to show income. Dividend
payers also provide substantially greater returns over time.
According to Ned Davis Research, since 1972, companies that
raised or began paying dividends returned an annualized
10.2%, on average, compared to 4.4% for the non-dividend
payers - over 2.5 times the return. Companies that consistently
raise their dividends are above-average businesses that
yield an increasing income stream. Right now, even with
the market at a several-year high, dividend stocks are hot.
Am I suggesting that traders forsake covered calls for dividend
stocks? No. But dividend stocks have implications for covered
writers, as the note below discusses.
Trade
Tip: These basic dividend facts have
implications for covered call writers, since the goal
in covered writing is to choose stable stocks that offer
good premium. A steady dividend history is not a bad place
to start in the chain of analysis. While the premium income
will not generally be as good as with growth stocks, dividend
payers tend to be less volatile. Also, more expensive.
Writing calls consistently on dividend-paying portfolio
stocks, which can double or triple the income stream,
is an excellent income strategy.
Measuring
Dividends
The
dividend yield compares the amount of annual dividend
income to the share price. Dividend yield is the annual
dividend per share divided by the share price. Thus if the
annual dividend per share is $1.00 and the stock price $20,
the dividend yield is 5%. The yield allows comparison of
the income potential of a company compared to other stocks
in the same industry. A low yield compared to industry peers
may simply indicate a judgment by management that the company
does not need to pay high dividends. It could also mean
that the company cannot afford to pay dividends commensurate
with those of peer companies.
| Dividend
Yield |
= |
Annual
Dividend per Share
Stock
Price |
Note:
CallWriter members can instantly find the dividend yield
for any company by clicking the company's name on the
Real Time Lists™ (which opens the CallWriter Research
Page). The dividend yield percentage will be shown on
the Snapshot page that opens.
The
dividend coverage ratio, on the other hand, measures
the company's ability to pay its stated dividend. To calculate
the ratio, earnings per share is divided by the dividend
per share. Thus if the company earns $5.00 per share for
the year and pays a $1.00 annual dividend per share, the
coverage ratio would be 5, indicating that 20% of earnings
are being paid to shareholders. A coverage ratio of 2 to
3 is just about right. Below 1.5, the company is hard-pressed
to pay the dividend, and below 1 the company is paying it
out of retained earnings, a terrible practice. On the other
hand, the further above 4 the coverage gets, the more question
there should be why the dividend is so low.
| Dividend
Coverage Ratio |
= |
Earnings
per Share
Dividend
per Share |
Then
there is the dividend discount model, which aims
to value a stock today based on a discount of estimated
future cash flow (the dividends). Predicted future dividends
are added and discounted back to present value to arrive
at the current "value" of a share of stock under
the dividend discount model. A share is considered "undervalued"
if the value obtained from the model is higher than the
share's current price; and "overvalued"
if the model price is lower. The model assumes what the
future dividend cash flow will be, and thus suffers from
the same flaws as other hypothetical measures. And there
are many variations of the formula. The valuation reached
is only as good as the inputs used to compute it. Still,
a valuation model has to start somewhere, and a lot of finance
types use the dividend discount model.
How
the Ex-Dividend Date Works
Payment
of a dividend is never automatic, and the company's board
of directors must authorize (declare) payment of the dividend.
There are four critical dates related to each dividend declared:
| Declaration
date |
|
This
is the date the board of directors announces the dividend
to the shareholders and to the markets generally. |
| Ex-dividend
date |
|
On
and after the ex-dividend date, the stock trades without
the dividend (meaning stock buyers won't receive it).
It is also known simply as the ex-date, or
the date the stock goes ex-. The ex-date
is the dividing line for when a stock buyer gets
the dividend. Those who buy the stock before
the ex-date will receive the dividend. Those who buy
it on or after the ex-date will not. If you
already own the stock by the ex-date, you will of
course receive the dividend.
The
term cum dividend is used for the period before
the ex-date when the stock still is trading with the
dividend. |
| Record
date |
|
The
dividend is paid only to those who own the stock of
record. The record date is the date on which
the company determines who owns the stock and will be
entitled to receive the dividend. |
| Payment
Date |
|
The
payment date is the date the company mails out
dividend checks. It usually is a week or so after the
record date. |
How
the Ex-Dividend Date Works
The
ex-dividend date is used to make sure dividend checks go
to the right people. The ex-date is the second business
day before the record date. As the example below
illustrates, if the record date is on Friday the 16th, the
ex-date would be the preceding Wednesday the 14th. It is
structured this way because of the way stock trades are
settled under the current T+3 system, which means that trades
must be settled (stock delivered by the buyer and paid for
by the purchaser) on the third day following the trade ("T").
| |
|
Ex-Dividend
Date |
|
Record
Date |
| Monday |
Tuesday |
Wednesday |
Thursday |
Friday |
| 12th |
13th |
14th |
15th |
16th |
If
you buy on the ex-dividend date (Wednesday), which is only
two days before the record date, you will not receive the
dividend, because the trade will not yet have settled by
the Friday record date. In order to receive the dividend,
you would have to buy the stock on or before Tuesday the
13th in the above example in order for the trade to settle
by the Friday record date. If the stock is bought on Tuesday,
for example, then the trade would settle on Friday, and
the buyer would receive the dividend.
Trade
Tip: In order to sell the stock and still
receive the dividend, you must own the stock while it
is still cum dividend (before the Wednesday ex-date in
the above example) and sell it on or after the ex-date.
This applies of course to covered call writers, as well.
Types
of Dividends
The
two main types of dividends are cash and stock.
Cash dividends typically are paid quarterly, sometimes semiannually.
Occasionally a company will declare a one-time dividend,
such as the $3.00 dividend Microsoft paid in 2004. This
is known as an "extra" dividend. The stock dividend
(known in olden days as a "scrip" dividend) is
paid in the the form of shares of the company's stock. Stock
dividends are usually paid when the company is short of
cash.
To
Pay or Not to Pay
A
company is not required to pay dividends, even if that has
been its historical practice. The board has pretty much
absolute discretion whether to declare them. Sometimes companies
cut dividends or even suspend them entirely when the going
gets tough in order to use the cash for working capital.
Cutting, much less suspending, the dividend works a real
hardship on those shareholders (usually older persons) who
depend on dividend income. Moreover, investors tend to view
a steady dividend history as a mark of a good investment
stock. A mature company that cuts, or worse, stops, the
dividend can expect the stock to plummet. A drop of 30%
or more can easily occur. Not surprisingly, companies don't
like to cut or suspend the dividend unless it is necessary.
On the other hand, the market can penalize a company that
continues to pay a fat dividend when payment would be a
poor business practice in light of the company's current
financial picture.
Taxation
of Dividends
of this writing federal tax law provides a break on the
taxation of dividends for "qualifying dividend income."
Taxation is too large a subject to cover in this article,
but I have already described the taxation of dividends and
the ramifications of covered call writing on dividend taxation
in detail in an earlier article. To read it, click
here.
Do
dividend payments affect covered call writers? Yes! Next
week's newsletter will explore the effects of dividend payments
upon the prices of options and the underlying stock.

Question:
Would it be a feasible covered call trading strategy to
concentrate in calls that have a high open interest (OI),
which indicates strong liquidity in the call series, and
to avoid calls with low OI?
Answer:
Not necessarily. The level of OI is only one
factor to consider in trade selection. While I tend to avoid
low-OI calls, keep in mind these factors:
| 1. |
High-volume
stocks tend to have a high level of OI in the calls
(at least in those calls clustered around the money)
as a general rule, and low-volume stocks will have a
low level of OI. The deeper the market interest in the
stock, the more options will be traded on it for income,
speculation or hedging purposes. Some stocks normally
have more option volume than others; and of course important
events in a stock's life may provoke a lot of options
activity for a short period. If the underlying stock
itself meets the CallWriter minimum for average daily
volume, the call series usually will, also. But you
have to analyze each trade. |
| 2. |
The
covered call trade wins or loses based primarily on
the behavior of the underlying stock, not on
the liquidity of the call series. This is precisely
why stock selection is so vital for the covered writer:
consistently writing the wrong stocks will hurt an account
(this is why CallWriter devotes so much of its trader
education to trade selection). For a straight options
trader, call liquidity is crucial, but it is less important
for the covered call writer. This is because the call
writer's goal is not trading in the ordinary sense of
the word or speculation, but to pull in a stream of
premium income from good stocks without being hurt by
those stocks. Calls with OI below 500 should be avoided,
and I prefer to see at least 1,000 contracts. More is
better. |
|