|
Should
We Close Early?
We
will not be called out of USG, apparently, unless it floats
back up overf $15 right before the close. Had we been
called out of the stock at $15, our return would have
been $0.92. We got $1.03 in premium, sure, but
this call was slightly in the money (ITM)... we paid $15.11
for USG and if called would have had to sell at $15, losing
$0.11 per share. There is no formula here, really, just
simple arithmetic:
Total
Premium |
- |
Loss
on Stock |
= |
Return
before Costs |
|
|
1.03 |
- |
0.11 |
= |
0.92 |
But
it took two commissions to enter this trade,
one each for the stock and call legs (one to buy stock,
one to sell the calls). Let's assume the trade cost to
close is $15 per leg, for a total of $30. If only one
contract was opened, the cost to close would be $0.30
per share ($30 ÷ 100 shares) , and if two
contracts were opened, half that - $0.15 per share
($30 ÷ 200 shares). Let's assume we opened
two contracts, so our realistic return if called out at
the $15 strike - after deducting trade costs - would not
be $0.92 but $0.77 (0.92 - 0.15). I just think
of it as having really received $0.77 in net premium.
TIP:
CallWriter members using our Trade Management Calculator™
can easily take trading costs into account by subtracting
the commission cost per share from the premium received.
See the Money
Management II article for more of my views relating
to covered calls and trade commissions,
Should
we buy back the call and sell USG to close the position,
or take another course of action, also discussed below?
The stock is down as I write from $15.11 to $14.87, so
closing immediately would take the return down from the
$0.77 in net premium received to $0.52, lopping
$0.25 off the return.
But wait, in order to close, we first must buy back the
calls, and there are trading comissions to pay, also.
Let's
assume it would cost $0.20 (the asked price) to
buy back the calls. The cost of buying them back never
goes to zero, even on expiration day. We also have to
pay trading commissions on the transactions to close
the covered call trade, another two legs (buy back calls
and sell stock). Since we're assuming we've run two USG
contracts, closing will cost us $0.15 per share, as explained
above. require two commissions, one each for the stock
and call legs. Let's assume the trade cost to close is
$15 per leg, for a total of $30. If only one contract
was opened, the cost to close would be $0.30 per share,
and if two contracts were opened, half that - $0.15
per share. Here is how closing looks in table form, assuming
we opened two contracts in USG:
| Cost
to Close Trade - Stock is Now $14.87 |
| Bought
stock |
-15.11 |
| Wrote
AUG 15 Call |
1.03 |
| Trading
costs |
-0.15 |
| Net
Trade Debit
(cost basis) |
$
14.23 |
| |
|
| Buy
back calls |
-0.20 |
| Sell
stock |
14.87 |
| Trading
costs |
-0.15 |
| Net
Return on Closing |
$
0.29 |
The
original trade set up a potential return of $0.77 per
share if called out at $15. But the $0.20 per share cost
to buy back the calls and the $0.15 per share commission
cost really ate up the return. Closing early will therefore
take the expected return on the USG trade from 0.77 down
to 0.29. Ouch! Closing is not a good idea, unless
you feared a selloff in USG. Letting the AUG calls expire
worthless is free if the stock is not dropping.
TIP:
Notice how important trading costs are in this position?
Trading 3 contracts would lower the entry and exit commissions
from 0.15 to 0.10 per share. Trading 5 contracts would
lower them to 0.06 per share, which would make closing
a different analysis. In my opinion, traders should
always write 3 or more contracts per covered call trade.
Instead
of closing the position out before expiration, we could
simply do nothing and let the calls expire, then sell
the stock next week after expiration. Assuming we would
still get today's $14.87 per share, the profit picture
improves slightly, as shown below:
| Let
Calls Expire and Sell Stock at $14.87 |
| Bought
stock |
-15.11
|
| Wrote
AUG 15 Call |
1.03
|
| Trading
costs |
-0.15
|
| Net
Trade Debit
(cost basis) |
$
14.23 |
| |
|
| Sell
stock |
14.87
|
| Trading
costs |
-0.075 |
| Net
Return on Closing |
$
0.565 |
By
waiting a few days, we saved the cost of buying back the
calls (0.20) and the commission to close the calls (0.075),
which increased profit on the trade from $0.29 to $0.565,
almost doubling it. Unless the stock seems to be in danger
of selling off, the choice is clear to me - wait.
Should
We Write the Stock Again?
Should
we keep USG and write another call? If it still looks
safe to write and the premium is acceptable, why not re-up
USG by writing a September call? So let's now assume the
AUG 15 Call has expired worthless. A stock option is said
to expire worthless when it is not exercised. In the above
example, you finished at expiration having collected $1.03
in premium with the stock slightly down. USG went into
a trading range back in mid-July 2003. It is now slightly
below the 50-day moving average (MA), testing it. It's
not showing particular strength or weakness, but remains
significantly above the $12.50 - $13 support level.
Assuming
we write USG again, which month should we write? I personally
would write September, since I don't like getting too
far out in time; I like to maximize the use of time decay
in the last 30 days of a call's life. Moreover, the longer
we're in the trade, the longer things have to go wrong.
So September is the choice if we rewrite, but which September
call? The Sept. 15 is paying about $1.20
now, the in-the-money Sept. 12.50 is paying $2.70
(fat premium, but remember you'll have to sell the stock
at $12.50 if you write this one).
The
decision whether to rewrite or not should depend on a
new evaluation and assessment of USG next week on Monday
or Tuesday after AUG expiration. If USG then seems strong,
there is no technical reason not to write the 15 Call.
Here is a table showing how the two SEP strikes compare
economically right now, assuming that each strike is in
the money at SEP expiration and we're called out of USG:
| |
Sept.
12.50 Call |
Breakeven |
Sept.
15 Call |
Breakeven |
| Bought
Stock |
-$15.11 |
-$15.11 |
-$15.11 |
-$15.11 |
| August
Premium (net)* |
+$
0.87 |
+$
0.87 |
+$
0.87 |
+$
0.87 |
| Sept.
Call Premium |
+$
2.70 |
+$ 2.70 |
+$ 1.20 |
+$ 1.20 |
| Trade
cost (calls) |
-$
0.075 |
|
-$
0.075 |
|
| Sale
of Stock at strike |
+$12.50 |
|
+$15.00 |
|
| Trade
cost (calls) |
-$
0.075 |
|
-$
0.075 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| Net
Return (overall) |
$
0.97 |
|
$ 1.97 |
|
|
Basis (breakeven) |
|
$11.53 |
|
$13.03 |
*Even
though we got a total of $1.03 for the AUG calls,
trade costs
to open the position lowered the net premium
to $0.87 (1.03 - 0.15).
If
we are called out of both strikes (meaning USG is over
$15 at SEP expiration), there is far more money in writing
the SEP 15C, nearly double the return; but it only lowers
our breakeven in the trade from $14.23 to $13.03, slightly
above major support. On the other hand, the SEP 12.5C
would lower our cost basis from the current $14.23 to
$11.53, which is well below a strong support level in
USG; not a bad place to be. However, the SEP 12.5C does
not offer a particularly enticing return. Our return if
we sell the stock at $14.87 - see the second example above
- is $0.565, and writing the SEP 12.5C adds less than
0.40 to the overall return.
So
is the 15 Call the best strike to write? Only if you
believe USG will hold its price. A market downtrend
could easily carry USG down to its support level around
$12.50, or through it.
The
12.50 Call yields a much lower profit, since the net premium
is $1.12 for both months, about a 7.4% return for a 52-day
trade. This annualizes to a return of more than 100%,
without compounding, so it isn't bad. However, the 12.50
call gives downside protection all the way to $11.38,
meaning USG would have to drop below $11.38 to deal a
loss. But clearly, the money is in the Sept. 15 Call.
This analysis illustrates the dilemma always facing the
trader: take the safer but lower return (12.50) or the
higher but riskier return (15)?
Ultimately,
the decision will be based on what you think the market
and USG will do prior to Sept. 19th expiration. The above
chart illustrates how you compare different strike options
in deciding where the money is. Our proprietary Trade
Management Calculator available to CallWriter
members also is invaluable in making these calculations,
since it allows you to instantly compare two different
strikes in writing another call at expiration.

Ways
to Try CallWriter
 |
Try
CallWriter for 10 days without risk
- absolutely free! You'll have full
access to our membership site! A
$27.00 value Details |
|
 |
Buy
one month of CallWriter membership
and get the second month free! $79.95 Save $79.95 Details |
|
 |
Buy
John's Ultimate Covered Call Book
now and get two full months of CallWriter
membership. $139.95 Save $119.90 Details |
Contribute
an Article
To
contribute an article to the Money NewsLetter,
send your contribution, along with your promotional
byline, to: newsletter@callwriter.com.
We don't pay contributors, but we will include
your byline and a link to your website.
Reproduction
Don't
hesitate to print out this newsletter for
your own use or forward a copy of it to your
friends and associates (we want you to), but
please ask permission before reproducing the
content in any form -- we would like to know
who you are and how you are using it.
Disclaimer
We
are not brokers, investment advisers or securities
analysts and do not recommend the purchase,
sale or holding of any security. Your use
of any information or strategy appearing in
this newsletter or on CallWriter.com is solely
at your own risk. We urge our newsletter subscribers
and CallWriter.com website members to do all
requisite and analysis and properly plan each
trade prior to making the trade and to manage
each trade effectively. Covered call and other
potential trades discussed in this newsletter
or on CallWriter.com do not constitute trading
recommendations by CallWriter or any other
person and are presented by solely for informational
and educational purposes. |
|