|
A covered call write should
be constructed to match the trade’s
underpinning strategy and
your expectations for the stock over
the trade’s expected duration. By
the strategy, I mean of course the strategy
selected by you. By expectations, I refer
of course to technical expectations for
the stock, perhaps its industry and perhaps
even the market. By now you know that you
should like, respect and be willing to marry
the stock from a fundamental standpoint.
But unless you want to just
spin the bottle, technical analysis will
- in light of where premium is found - suggest
which call strike call strike to write,
and which expiration month. It will also
indicate whether a protective put should
be purchased.
When constructing a covered
call trade, thoroughness would include considering
the following factors:
- The
quality of the stock.
- Stick with excellent, established
and profitable companies
-
Your technical evaluation of the stock
and perhaps its industry.
-
Likely direction over the trade's anticipated
duration
- Support
and resistance levels.
-
Be clear where they are and their respective
strengths
- The
level or return desired (and available)
for the risk undertaken.
-
Is premium accptable? The more risk or
uncertainty, demand a higher return
- Your
preferred trade duration.
-
You are in control of this, to the extent
a trader controls anything
- Level
of implied volatility (IV) and impending
news.
-
High IV on a mid-cap or smaller company:
you'd better know the news
- Your
trade strategy:
- Capturing
time decay, playing implied volatility,
timing a move, etc.
Don't view these trade planning
points as a list to memorize; they are simply
common-sense considerations. If you like
short-term trades, for example, either write
short-term trades from the outset or write
longer-term calls with an expectation of
buying them back on a dip in stock price
or a collapse in implied volatility, not
intending to stay in the trade through call
expiration. Sure, you might wind up being
in the trade longer than planned if events
so transpire, but we are just planning a
trade here, not ordering the cosmos.
Suppose the fat option
premium implies high volatility but the
stock is solid and you doubt it will move
significantly; it makes sense to design
a trade that will capture the IV collapse
and allow a quick close. On the other hand,
if the news event driving IV is of a dangerous
nature, you must either buy a protective
put or pass on the trade. An easy and common
example: when a strongly trending stock
has pulled back to test support or is at
the bottom of a well-defined range, a great
trade can be built to take advantage of
the snapback off support.
None of this requires a
crystal ball; leave it in the closet. It
is just a matter of determining the best
strategy for a trade and whether the best
call strikes/months for that strategy offer
acceptably fat premium. For example, if
you are only interested in deeply ITM calls
and they offer no return, move on. If the
trade strategy you think is right requires
using OTM calls that offer little return,
you must either leg in for a better return
(trusting the stock's advance to fatten
the premium) or pass on the trade. And so
it goes.
As noted, your strategy
and expectations for the stock (your trade
rationale), are crucial in proper planning.
You will not always be right on direction
or other technical reads, but once you have
approved the stock as a potential writing
candidate, the technical picture heavily
dictates the trade's construction. You might
ask, isn't this getting dangerously close
to directional trading? That argument holds
some water, but not much. First, everyone
who trades, teaches or picks covered calls
has to select trades somehow. And
when you select a trade, no matter how you
evaluate it or read the tea leaves, you
are stock picking.
If a stock is selling off,
would you ignore that? I certainly hope
not. And if a stock in a strong industry
is in a long-term uptrend (e.g., ATI as
I write this), would you treat it like a
stock in a tight trading range? Probably
not. For those who doubt the viability of
using the technicals to construct the trade
strategy, what is a better approach? Certainly,
the blind application of a single strategy
to all trades (e.g., writing everything
OTM no matter what) is not a better approach,
nor is the rigid application of any formula.
A directional trader bases the strategy
solely, or almost solely, on the technicals.
That's not what I do, and I suggest you
not do it, either. For the savvy covered
writer, the technicals merely inform the
logic of a trade that meets strong fundamental
criteria.
Whoops, isn't all this talk
about technicals really backing up into
the subject of trade selection? Yes and
no. While reviewing a trade candidate's
technical picture, you should also be thinking
how you would write the trade; your strategy.
They are not really separate analyses. Your
technical review will dictate whether a
trade is possible and what the strategy
should be. Your trade planning process will
reveal whether the premium makes it worthwhile.
Put differently, if during
the technical review you like the stock,
what, precisely, did you like? And what
you liked is usually what you should do.
Hmmm, you might say to yourself - this stock
of an excellent company is reaching the
bottom of a well-defined trading range and
seems poised to head back up in its range.
You just stated your trade strategy, didn't
you?
You should not blithely
trust the chart, of course, and should not
bet unborn children on it. But ignoring
the plain evidence of the chart also is
faintly ridiculous. If nothing else, using
technical analysis will improve your returns
because it improves trade construction to
take advantage of what is happening in the
real world. If you lack technical skill
(get some, I strongly advise) or have no
faith in your reads, stick with a conservative
covered call strategy. But with experience
you will see how trades go, and you'll see
missed opportunities, missed returns, that
were easily yours with the proper trade
construction. We all go through this process,
and there is no better learning.
But I assure you, and I
have a lot of experience with my trading
and that of many CallWriter members upon
which to base this statement, that using
solid technical analysis will help you to
build better, more profitable trades and
avoid some of the venomous ones. Once you
have eliminated negative technical pictures,
and known, impending news events, the only
things left to hurt you in a trade are bad
luck - the unforeseeable asteroid strikes
of the market. They don't happen too often
and can't be foretold, so we are best advised
to stick with the proven elements of trade
planning.
So the technicals play an
important role in how we plan and build
the trade and set the stage for rational
trade expectations. Next we must select
a strategy that capitalizes on the technical
picture and available premium. For example,
are you writing extremely high implied volatility
(IV) in the expectation that IV will collapse?
Are you writing with an expectation that
the stock soon will pull back to a support
level and rebound? Is your goal to maximize
the use of time decay? Like the stock but
are concerned about a sell-off or a pull
back in the market? These are the kinds
of real-world concerns that covered call
writers must take into account.
Now let's take a look at
some common-sense approaches to building
the covered call. The following examples
illustrate how your strategy and reasonable
expectations for the stock affect trade
construction:
1.
Writing high implied volatility in expectation
of an IV collapse:
•
Write an ATM or OTM call in the
second or third expiration month out in
order to get more premium, since the time
value of those calls further out will
collapse also when IV falls. If the stock's
technical picture is negative, this strategy
is not indicated.
2. You expect a trending stock to pull
back to support, then rebound:
• Write
a deeply ITM call in the expectation of
buying the call back at a profit when
the stock pulls back. Writing a month
further out will increase time value.
Then sell the option again after the stock
snaps back off support – that is,
trade the call with the stock’s
movement. If wrong on the stock's movement,
you can close the short call or roll out.
3.
Maximizing time decay:
• Writing
current-month calls takes maximum advantage
of time decay. Close to expiration, close
the trade for a profit, or roll the calls
out to the next month if premium and the
trade's outlook both are acceptable.
4. You expect an imminent move up in
the stock:
• Write
OTM calls in the current month or next
month. If the stock moves up but not enough
to get called by expiration, you are still
ahead of the game.
•
Alternatively,
leg in to the trade – buy the stock
and wait to write the calls on the stock’s
advance. By waiting and writing an ATM
or OTM call once the stock has moved up
an acceptable amount, the premium written
will be much larger.
•
Alternative
3: do a blended write, also known as scaling
in, buying the stock and writing some
calls now and some when the stock advances.
5. An excellent stock is approaching
a major resistance level:
• The
stock can be expected to pull back from
resistance, so you write a deeply ITM
call, expecting to buy it back profitably
as the stock falls. We buy an ITM put
with a strike at or above the resistance
level a month or two further out than
the call and sell the put at a profit
as it gains with the stock’s pullback.
This is not an ideal technical picture,
unless you already own the stock or like
it and are willing to keep it.
6. The industry or overall market is
pulling back, or you fear a pull back:
• One
alternative is to hedge bets by writing
a deeply ITM call, and you can add an
OTM protective put for the same expiration
month if you fear a catastrophic collapse
in the stock. Sure, the put eats up some
call premium and does not confer complete
protection, but it may be worth it for
peace of mind.
•
Another alternative
is to write ATM calls for maximum premium
and also purchase an ATM or ITM put several
months out (look for very low time value
in the put), which will add significant
protection and also adds another potential
profit source. Once the put's time value
is recouped, the call writes will get
into profit territory.
7. You seek a longer-term write but prefer
not to trade actively:
• Pick
very high-quality, stable stocks. Write
long-term ITM or ATM calls, either LEAPS
or calls with a 6-month or greater expiration
that reduce the cost basis to a level
at or below major long-term support.
8. You seek a longer-term write and will
accept low returns for low or no risk:
• Use
the same trade picks as in the prior example,
but in addition buy an OTM put with the
same expiration. The return may not exceed
10% annually but the trade can be built
to risk only a couple of percent of the
net debit. Experienced traders might accept
greater risk by buying a further OTM put
slightly above major long-term support.
I believe
that upon technical review, the stock will
tell you what to do. For example, it is
generally a bad practice to write OTM calls
– which offer lower premium compared
to ATM calls and the lowest downside protection,
yet are maddeningly slow to lose value if
you have to buy them back on the stock's
pullback - unless you believe based on the
best evidence that the stock will increase
in value during the trade's planned duration.
So if you like writing OTM, look for stocks
in this technical posture. If a stock is
not in this posture, don't write it OTM
unless premium is high and another OTM strategy
works (e.g., your goal is to capture
the collapse of impled volatility and the
stock's technical picture is not actually
negative); select another strategy.
This is
trade construction soundly informed by the
charts, not directional trading. As such,
we are merely employing good old horse sense
in a rational attempt to sweat the most
out of the trade.
These are
by no means all of the possible scenarios
and strategies for planning covered call
writes, nor are all the potentially good
strategies for the above situations necessarily
presented. They do illustrate, however,
how I plan and construct the covered call
based on real-world considerations. I want
everyone to adopt a powerful (empowered)
and flexible approach to covered writing
that is grounded in common sense.
|